Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    fullbenefit is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    February 2019
    Posts
    331
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 70 Times in 50 Posts

    Lightbulb Let's add a feedback system!

    Most of us have various transactions with each other such as content writing, SEO/Dev services, website/domain/account sales and more.

    Let's add a feedback system where private members could give each other positive/negative/neutral feedbacks.

    This way it would be easy to see who has a good track record and with whom you should be more careful.

    It should be pretty easy to add since this is a forum.



  2. The Following User Says Thank You to fullbenefit For This Useful Post:

    drifter8 (7 June 2021)

  3. #2
    Join Date
    November 2005
    Posts
    4,510
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks
    1,920
    Thanked 2,216 Times in 1,278 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PokCas View Post
    whom you should be more careful.
    All private members should be trustworthy, as they should have gone thru a veto system.

    Be a much better idea to have this activated on the public forums, where I'm sure, a lot more transactions take place

  4. #3
    Juan Roman's Avatar
    Juan Roman is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2013
    Posts
    522
    Thanks
    165
    Thanked 242 Times in 169 Posts

    Default

    Sounds like a very good idea to me, especially for the public forum as AussieDave suggests. Easier than asking around the GPWA members you do trust for advice every time you plan to do business with the not-so-familiar forum members.

    I would be happy to give feedback on people we have done business so far, and I'm sure our clients would be glad to do the same. Even though my experience is overwhelmingly positive, there were some times that I opted against name-and-shame tactics. In those cases I would have gladly given them the negative feedback.
    • Teamwork - iGaming content & localisation services. Shortlisted for Best Digital Agency at 2024 iGB Affiliate Awards.
    • Pokie Machines
    • Hiring native writers with iGaming experience.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Juan Roman For This Useful Post:

    drifter8 (7 June 2021), fullbenefit (13 May 2021)

  6. #4
    fullbenefit is offline Public Member
    Join Date
    February 2019
    Posts
    331
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 70 Times in 50 Posts

    Default

    Yeah, GPWA definitely needs some new updates, just like this one.

  7. #5
    Triple7 is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    January 2015
    Posts
    2,887
    Thanks
    2,067
    Thanked 2,471 Times in 1,341 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieDave View Post
    All private members should be trustworthy, as they should have gone thru a veto system.

    Be a much better idea to have this activated on the public forums, where I'm sure, a lot more transactions take place
    In theory, yes.

  8. #6
    johan_s is offline Private Member
    Join Date
    February 2020
    Posts
    244
    Thanks
    47
    Thanked 68 Times in 57 Posts

    Default

    Everyone I have met here at GPWA has been honest. So far. So I don't really think it is needed. I can see a lot of similar feedback systems and they can easily be manipulated as well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •